What? We're adults? SINCE WHEN? WHY DIDN'T ANYONE TELL ME?!?!

I recommend to rethink this approach. It is detectable for us.

[quote=Nolak Ataru]For everyone claiming "ISBoxing incursions" and "ISBoxing anoms" is dead..... nah it isn't. Since we can still use ISBoxer's VideoFX and DXNothing to rearrange our screens, it may take us a little longer to lock each target, but not by much.

This thread has degenerated to the point it's become like two bald men fighting over a comb.

It's still not clear to me what things are allowed ...
Using software to broadcast a single keypress to several clients is now not allowed
Having separate keys to send commands to several clients, and pressing them together with a 'hardware mod' (such as a big stick) is also now not allowed

but If I have one key to do a thing on one client, and another key to do something on another client - can I press both these keys at the same time with my hands (and if so, do they have to be pressed with separate hands or fingers?)

I can easily press a pair of keys together reliably 100 times out of 100, so I don't see how CCP would distinguish this from either broadcasting one keypress to two clients, or using a hardware mod to press two keys with one action.

Are we allowed to press more than one key* at a time in eve now? And if so how will we avoid being suspected of breaking the new rules while doing this?

[*where each key has a distinct effect in the eve universe]

It seems to me that we can still do most of the same things as before (a little less conveniently) while not breaking the new rules

Only if you think of PLEX as having a limited number, or that players "must" buy it instead of using a credit card or unsubbing for a month or so.


Again you participate in some strange form of victim blaming and circular logic, but instead of blaming victims of actual violence you've somehow managed to convince yourself that CCP is Always Right (Incarna, anyone?) and that any change they do Must Be Right because CCP is Always Right, and that if the playerbase objects to a change they Must Be Wrong.

CCP is actively limiting our playstyle via the worst way possible. If people have a problem with ISBoxer and the way it's being used right now, (and I've seen more complaints and people quitting because of the local CODE monkeys than a 10-man skiff fleet) then what's to say CCP won't start limiting accounts active in the future? CCP is attempting to appease a vocal minority by implementing a massive change, and whenever a company listens to the vocal minority instead of attempting to get a poll from a greater majority of the playerbase and act upon it, bad things happen.

In your opinion and the opinion of several others but not in mine and several others. Unless there is a poll taken we won't know what the majority think. And the majority are not reading this thread nor are involved in the forums. So it is a moot point.

Opinion vs opinion doesn't solve anything.

We have don't have like it, as said before adapt or move on. Some are choosing to move on some are choosing to adapt. We'll suss it out when the time comes.

Let me explain how its going to be. From the 1st January, i'm going to be unemployed with about 10 of my previous friends.

However, i'm not going to go down without a fight, so in order for me to keep my subs running i'm going to need ISk and your lovely fat haulers and freighters will have to bear the brunt of that. I hope thats ok with you, as I will not be f*ing up your economy too much.

I would actually enjoy the game again, as opposed to shooting stupid rats, I will have a lots of fan mail, i'm sure. There are always consequences to actions, and this is going to be mine. Ganking in high sec is legit. I will need 3-6 accounts and i will manually fly all of them, no need for Isboxer either.

I'm looking forward to your fan mail and thanks for freeing me from the shackles of incursions, it was getting rather tedious running those bloody things anyhow....

PS. I'm an alt, so see you in Hek, Uitander, Bei Deltole, Aufay, Balle or any 05, 06 near you from the 2nd of JAN 2015
Udema is cesspool so i wouldn't go there

That might be the case. And if they did, it would at least have an actual impact on what the whiners are whining about. As it stands the change is pointless because the impact will be minimal. Considering I don't use ISBoxer generally, I'm not particularly invested in it and don't really care if it goes. What I care about is knee-jerk changes with no gameplay value being added to appease whining carebears for a week until they realise it didn't change much. People playing with ISBoxer are generally going to be better at the game than a solo carebear whining in an ice belt. Even if all tools were completely banned they would still be at the bottom of the most peasant level income.

Jesus you sound like the journalists who keep spouting that "Gaming is Dead" crap. If CCP wanted to make this announcement with no room for discussion they could have made this thread locked on the first post and not allow for discussion.

I personally love how you attempt to dismiss the very idea that CCP listens to the userbase, especially after such things as the bombers thread where CCP backpedaled on the bombers decloaking each other nerf.

Your attempt to censor the userbase is silly. Please never post again unless you're willing to let the other side have a reasonable discussion.

Uh, no. And I often post this much. Where have you been? I have my own fan club.

Still don't see where I ranted and raved about "the Man is keepin me down" (very heavily paraphrased with the help of two screwdrivers).
I've admitted that this will stop the HQ solo runners. I'll also admit it will stop the 50-man bombing runs from the larger fleets. But anyone who's dedicated enough will and has found a way to continue multiboxing. Scroll wheel down bound to F1, scroll wheel up bound to left click, and ta-da.
If CCP wanted to do the right thing, they would've balanced the game instead of immediately pulling out the banhammer.